As I said in Blog 11 the book I have chosen was Fallen by Lauren Kate. The approach I plan on using is Archetypal Criticism. The main characters, Luce Price deals with shadows haunting her since she was 7 years old, while Daniel Grigori deals with falling for the same woman every 17 years. Both deal with Archetypal Criticism in there own way, but both deal with the same Archetypal, the death-rebirth myth. Daniel is doomed to fall in love with the same girl every 17 years and with a kiss she dies. Luce doesn't know about it yet but she's the woman that Daniel falls in love with every 17 years. With a kiss from him Luce dies, and is then reborn as a new person, and 17 years later she meets Daniel again. The reason why they're both doomed to this life is because one is a fallen angel while the other one is immortal. The death-rebirth myth was discovered by James G. Frazer, a Scottish anthropologist. Fallen follows Frazer's theory, death(Fall), rebirth(Srping). Basically Frazer theory is: the death stage comes around the fall when the final crops are havest while the rebirth stage comes around when you see the first sign of crops blooming. In the prologue, just by the way of the words, the author describes the setting of the place and weather.
Blog 16: Reflection on class
-
*** PLEASE READ THE NEW BLOGS 7,8,9,10 IW ILL HAVE THEM ALL FINSHED BEFORE
THE END OF TODAY****
I just loved this class overall it was a great class and I ...
15 years ago

1 comments:
What has the author done well? What stands out to the reader?
It is a good introduction and beginning to a summary. Keep going.
Is the draft complete? What needs to be done today to get it to the next level by the end of class?
I do not believe the draft is complete. It is too short and needs more detail.
Does the draft conform to the assignment? Why or why not?
It does conform, it just needs to be finished.
Are the elements of the critrical approach (i.e. Monomyth/Hero’s Quest, Symbolism, Psychology, etc.) clearly defined and then examined in the work of choice?
The type of approach that is wanted to be used is mentioned, but thats about it. You need to go more into detail about it.
Is the discussion of the work detailed? Can you “see” what is happening in the story?
The main ideas are there. Keep working on details.
Is the language clear? What problems do you see?
The language is clear.
Does the author cite their sources properly (everyone should at least cite their story)? If in doubt, Google search a few passages.
The sources are not cited. You should atleast cite the story itself.
Post a Comment